Member since: Sun Jul 11, 2004, 07:58 PM
Number of posts: 35,650
Number of posts: 35,650
- 2015 (40)
- 2014 (144)
- 2013 (111)
- 2012 (186)
- Older Archives
The Iran Contra panel is especially relevant.
Reagan would NEVER make a deal with Iran, would he?
Just like he'd never trade arms for hostages.
Props to Brian McFadden at Daily Kos
Posted by yurbud | Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:11 PM (2 replies)
This reads like a bad satire, but it's real.
The test of any of the crap that corporate education reformers come up with is whether they would send their own kids to schools like this or demand that their kids elite private schools are run the same way.
I don't think so.
Democratic politicians need to realize that can't afford to take donations from and follow the orders of the Wall Street crowd trying to take over public education or they will lose not only teachers, but parents, and the kids who had to endure this once they are grown up.
They're short term corruption will pay off with a potentially terminal cancer on the party and possibly kill it.
*Give him a warning,* said the voice through the earpiece I was wearing. I did Tom Bradyas instructed, speaking in the emotionless monotone Iíd been coached to use. But the student, a sixth grader with some impulsivity issues and whose trust Iíd spent months working to gain, was excited and spoke out of turn again. *Tell him he has a detention,* my earpiece commanded. At which point the boy stood up and pointed to the back of the room, where the three classroom *coaches* huddled around a walkie talkie. *Miss: donít listen to them! You be you. Talk to me! Iím a person! Be a person, Miss. Be you!*
Last year, my school contracted with the Center for Transformational Training or CT3 to train teachers using an approach called No Nonsense Nurturing. It c3powas supposed to make us more effective instructors by providing *immediate, non-distracting feedback to teachers using wireless technology.* In other words, earpieces and walkie talkies. I wore a bug in my ear. I didnít have a mouthpiece. Meanwhile an official No Nonsense Nurturer, along with the schoolís first year assistant principal and first year behavior intervention coach, controlled me remotely from the corner of the room where they shared a walkie talkie. I referred to the CT3 training as C-3PO after the Star Wars robot, but C-3PO actually had more personality than we were allowed. The robot also spoke his mind.
No Nonsense Nurturingô
If youíre not familiar with No Nonsense Nurturing or NNN, letís just say that there is more nonsense than nurturing. The approach starts from the view that no nonsense urban students, like my Lawrence, MA middle schoolers, benefit from a robotic style of teaching that treats, and disciplines, all students the same. This translated into the specific instruction that forbade us from speaking to our students in full sentences. Instead, we were to communicate with them using precise directions. As my students entered the room, I was supposed to say: *In seats, zero talking, page 6 questions 1-4.* But I donít even talk to my dog like that. Constant narration of what the students are doing is also key to the NNN teaching style. *Noel is is finishing question 3. Marjorie is sitting silently. Alfredo is on page 6.*
Posted by yurbud | Fri Jul 24, 2015, 02:56 PM (3 replies)
That is one part of Sandra Bland's story that even as a white guy, I identify with.
After getting a ticket or two when I couldn't afford them, if I saw a cop car right behind me, I would pull over and let him pass.
I think it was because one time when I was driving cross country, I noticed a cop behind me when I entered a small town, so I was careful to follow the speed limit, come to full stops at stops signs, and all of that from one end of town to the other. Just as I was about to hit the open road again, he hit the lights.
When he came up to my window, he asked if I had been drinking because I was driving so slow and weaving. The weaving was because I was constantly checking my rear view mirror to see if he was still back there. He let me off with a warning.
Once when a cop was behind me on a two lane street, I literally pulled over to the side and stopped to let him pass, and he came back to ask why I did that and said it made me look guilty of something.
Most of the time, I try to be more subtle now.
Needless to say, I was never arrested, jailed, or killed for doing this.
I'm wondering how many other people have or do this, and what the results were.
Posted by yurbud | Wed Jul 22, 2015, 12:53 PM (66 replies)
And has said they will put an end to it?
Posted by yurbud | Mon Jul 20, 2015, 05:21 PM (3 replies)
Especially by the time you get to the lower left panel.
Bigger at http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/07/13/1401176/-Cartoon-Sparky-s-inferno?detail=hide
Posted by yurbud | Mon Jul 13, 2015, 10:17 AM (10 replies)
Their gay marriage, abortion, and a couple of other positions were primarily appeals to religious folks, whose numbers are declining among the young.
The dog whistle racism on blacks is out for an election or two (okay, maybe just one), and the slightly more overt, passive aggressive racism of confederate worship is finally dead at the national and state level forever.
Bashing Latinos is a path to defeat at the national level.
Their economic policy of "let bankers and corporations run wild" probably chafes even many Republican voters (though they only seem to admit it to pollsters).
People across the board seem to be sick of our "War of Terror," on Muslims.
The ginned up World War with Russia is not going to be popular once regular folks realize that's what's in the pipe.
The only thing that seems to be keeping the GOP alive right now is corporate Democrats refuse to decisively put a stake in the core economic policies of deregulation, privatization of government services that diverts our tax dollars to private profits, and low taxes on the rich.
Likewise, corporate Democrats are not acting on a different foreign policy of essentially a unipolar world governed by banks for the profit of the 1%. For all the talk of spreading democracy, both parties will back any coup against a democratic government that tries to put the interests of their own people ahead of the demands of bankers and transnational corporations like oil companies in the Middle and Central Asia, banana plantations in Central America, and sweatshops everywhere else.
In Libya and Syria, Obama has done essentially what Bush did to Iraq: replace a government they don't like with no functional government at all.
And of course that foreign policy requires a military roughly as big as the rest of the world combined and several times larger than our top two potential adversaries, Russia or China, and even a couple of times larger than both of them put together.
A truly multipolar foreign policy that didn't use our military as a way for corporations and banks to make other countries an offer they can't refuse would allow our military to shrink to a truly defensive size, and any troops killed in that role would truly be fighting to preserve our freedom. But neither of the two major parties are going to do this.
What keeps the GOP alive?
The same thing that keeps the Washington Generals alive despite their existence long losing streak to the Harlem Globetrotters: they provide the illusion of competition.
Posted by yurbud | Sun Jul 12, 2015, 01:56 PM (22 replies)
You know how I know the corporate driven education reform movement is a scam?
They demand accountability from traditional public schools, so they can call them failures, but they dodge accountability themselves. And they dodge it with the help of the corrupt politicians who set up the deals like Arne Duncan.
And they avoid the difficult (and therefore more expensive to educate) students like English Language Learners and Special Education students.
They want to divert our tax dollars into their corporate profits without doing the same difficult job of real schools.
Don't we give Wall Street and hedge fund managers ENOUGH bailouts and corporate welfare without feeding our children's futures to their insatiable appetite?
When are people going to say enough?
It looks like a lot of people have, by asking for at least a moratorium on new charter schools.
Will Arne Duncan and his boss, Barack Obama listen?
June 8, 2015
The Honorable Arne Duncan
Secretary of Education
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202
Dear Mr. Secretary,
In 2010 and again in 2012, the Department of Educationís Office of Inspector General raised concerns about transparency and competency in the administration of the federal Charter Schools Program.
The Charter Schools Program, part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), offers federal funding to help establish, replicate and expand public charter schools across the country. Over the past twenty years, the federal government has spent a staggering $3.3 billion of taxpayer money to expand the number of charter schools in our communities.
The Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools (AROS), whose organizational members represent 7 million parents, community members, students, educators and school staff, believes that the public deserves more information on this program, its impacts and track record.
The OIG audit found a significant lack of accountability both within the federal Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII), which administers the Charter Schools Program, and within the State Education Agencies (SEA), which disburse the majority of the federal funds. For example, the audit found:
The failure of the Office of Innovation and Improvement and the State Education Agencies to track what happened to millions of federal dollars spent to open charter schools had these inevitable results:
These findings were backed up by a recent report by the Center for Media and Democracy, which conducted further investigation into the program at both the federal and state levels.
We at AROS would add our own concerns to those raised by the OIG. For example, is the Department of Education tracking the impacts of the program on student outcomes? Nationally, charter schools are disproportionately located in communities of color. Why? And they serve disproportionately fewer English Language Learners and students with disabilities. How does the Department justify these disparities? Would the $3.3 billion that has been spent on this program over the last 20 years have been better spent strengthening our traditional public schools rather than creating new, privately operated ones?
Mr. Secretary, as Congress debates reauthorization of ESEA, the Department is calling for a 48% increase in funding for the Charter Schools Program, despite mounting evidence of significant fraud, waste and abuse within the charter sector, and despite the warnings of your own Office of Inspector General that federal charter start-up and expansion funds are not adequately monitored or accounted for.
AROS would like to respectfully ask the following:
In April, the Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools released a public letter to the leadership of both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, calling for a moratorium on new federal funding for public charter schools. Our students and communities are not served when federal funding for education is distributed without accountability or transparency. We need to get it right.
We look forward to receiving your response.
Leigh Dingerson, interim coordinator and contact
202-288-2304 or Ldingerson@gmail.com
On behalf of The Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools:
The American Federation of Teachers
The Alliance for Educational Justice
The Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University
Center for Popular Democracy
Journey for Justice Alliance
National Education Association
The National Opportunity to Learn Campaign
Service Employees International Union
Posted by yurbud | Wed Jul 8, 2015, 12:40 PM (6 replies)
The great tragedy of this is that Hillary and any other DLC Dem will likely pursue the same privatization agenda albeit with better funding for the current system they are helping kill. But that is roughly like Pol Pot giving you a double rice ration while he decides if you are too educated to live.
Our K-12 education policy has been bought and is being dictated by hedge fund managers and hyper-wealthy individuals who see it as a potential source of profit like the Pentagon. Politicians in both major parties have sold our kids future like chattel.
We need a national candidate who will call bullshit on this and put education policy back in the hands of educators and academics who are called greedy for wanting to make a middle class standard of living--unlike the "reformers" who see this as a way to make their next billion.
ďThereís nothing else as large in all of society. Not the militaryónothingóis bigger.Ē
Thatís how Randy Best, Jeb Bushís business partner, sees public education, as an untapped market where untold billions are to be made when kids and their families become educational customers. Touting his impressive assault on public education while Florida governor in yesterdayís announcement of his 2016 candidacy, Bush may become the loudest proponent yet of turning public education into a for-profit enterprise.
Before getting into Bushís record and financial interests in for-profit education, a full understanding of the dystopian horrors of for-profit, privatized education is necessary. Bush offers it with a handful of Milton Friedman-esque catchwords and focus-grouped slogans, and it may be that the proposals sound innocuous and vaguely innovative until the slightest scrutiny is applied to the ideas ó at which point, itís difficult to imagine much worse than public education turned into a for-profit market. Because the most basic and collectively understood truisms about markets, when applied to children, take on a horrifying character.
First off, most businesses close. Something like 8 in 10 businesses close within 18 months. Itís an inconvenience when I drive up to a business to find itís closed its doors. Itís a whole different situation if Iím an eight-year-old with my backpack on and thatís my schoolóand itís the middle of the school year, like it was for students of a Dallas charter school in January of this year.
Posted by yurbud | Mon Jul 6, 2015, 11:30 AM (6 replies)
What will happen if the BRICS bank gets up and running and they offer terms don't run this kind of bust out scam on countries that Western banks have?
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia has not offered Greece to become a member of the New Development Bank that is being created by the BRICS group of five major emerging nations, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said on Thursday.
"We have not offered (membership to Greece)," Siluanov told journalists.
In May, Russian media reported that Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Storchak offered Athens to become the sixth member of the New Development Bank that is being formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
Leaders from the BRICS countries are meeting at the group's annual summit next week in Russia where they are expected to officially launch the bank, along with a joint currency reserve fund.
Posted by yurbud | Fri Jul 3, 2015, 03:47 PM (9 replies)
It is possible to imagine a Democrat saying something like this.
It's a lot harder to imagine leaders of either of the two parties here ACTING on these principles and going to mat for the American people against moneyed interests.
Instead, we get Obama telling Wall Street he's all that stands between them and the pitchforks, but he would protect them. Then he continues with their bailouts, trade deals, and toppling of regimes that don't do business exactly the way Wall Street banks dictate.
The Democrats can either become our Syriza or like they will lose the faith of the American people and be replaced by a new party that does look out for us.
Member of the European Parliament for Syriza
"Man is the measure of all things: of the things that are, that they are, of the things that are not, that they are not." -- Protagoras
Under these principles, democracy was created 2,500 years ago. Democracy was born out of need. The need of liberation from tyrannical regimes. The need of human liberation from centuries of oligarchy, absolutism, obscurantism. In the 2,500 years that followed, the setbacks were countless. There were some regimes that referred to themselves as "democracies," but only used this as a cover to impose absolutism.
These enemies sowed economic, political and environmental dictatorships in the name of "democracy," always creating enemies out of the general public and with the end goals of money and power.The current Greek government, which resulted from the January 25th elections, was also born out of need, the Greek people's need to get rid of politics that make "money holy and blessed."
In the name of balance sheets, the previous government threw away, like needless numbers, people and their needs.
Posted by yurbud | Thu Jul 2, 2015, 02:04 PM (5 replies)