Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:01 AM
alp227 (12,793 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
Shot-Up Image of President Draws a Secret Service InquiryLast edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:02 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
The Secret Service said Thursday that it was looking into a photograph posted on the Internet that showed a group of young Arizona men posing in the desert with guns while holding up what appeared to be a bullet-riddled image of President Obama’s face.
The photograph showed seven casually dressed young men, four of whom clutched weapons and one of whom held up a T-shirt covered with small holes and gashes and bearing a likeness of Mr. Obama above the word “HOPE.” The weapons held aloft appeared to be a revolver, a bolt-action rifle and two assault rifles. “We’re aware of it, and we’re conducting the appropriate follow-up steps,” said Ed Donovan, a Secret Service spokesman in Washington. The photo, along with the remark “Another trip to the ranch,” was posted on Jan. 20 on the Facebook page of Sgt. Pat Shearer, a police officer in Peoria, Ariz., a Phoenix suburb. The image was removed from Sergeant Shearer’s page on Thursday afternoon shortly after inquiries about it to the Peoria Police Department. Sergeant Shearer, a decorated officer who was honored in 2007 for helping to save a driver trapped in a burning vehicle, did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday. full: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/us/secret-service-looks-into-image-of-obama-riddled-with-bullets.html Here's a GD thread about this. photo:
And a police officer willfully let this get posted on his Facebook? If so he should be fired. Why is he promoting violent threats to the President? Oh yeah. Isn't the "Taxed Enough Already" Party supposed to be picketing the Peoria Police Department because their tax dollars are paying for a policeman who encourages crime? (But if it's Obama it's alright!
|
164 replies, 9866 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| alp227 | Jan 27 | OP | |
| Ecumenist | Jan 27 | #1 | |
| Gman | Jan 27 | #13 | |
| 24601 | Jan 27 | #109 | |
| Ecumenist | Jan 27 | #112 | |
| LostinRed | Jan 27 | #2 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #22 | |
| BrendaBrick | Jan 27 | #82 | |
| Cliffy44 | Feb 1 | #163 | |
| madokie | Jan 27 | #3 | |
| stlsaxman | Jan 27 | #6 | |
| NYC_SKP | Jan 27 | #18 | |
| Beartracks | Jan 28 | #137 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #26 | |
| Paladin | Jan 27 | #52 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #56 | |
| dreamnightwind | Jan 27 | #126 | |
| calimary | Jan 28 | #129 | |
| dreamnightwind | Jan 28 | #131 | |
| Hoyt | Jan 27 | #92 | |
| SunSeeker | Jan 27 | #110 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #115 | |
| onehandle | Jan 27 | #4 | |
| TxVietVet | Jan 27 | #5 | |
| deutsey | Jan 27 | #7 | |
| secondwind | Jan 27 | #8 | |
| emulatorloo | Jan 27 | #83 | |
| caveat_imperator | Jan 27 | #86 | |
| ThomThom | Jan 27 | #88 | |
| JustABozoOnThisBus | Jan 27 | #9 | |
| The Wizard | Jan 27 | #10 | |
| obamanut2012 | Jan 27 | #14 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 27 | #48 | |
| MH1 | Jan 27 | #72 | |
| The Wizard | Jan 27 | #80 | |
| obamanut2012 | Jan 27 | #12 | |
| Mz Pip | Jan 27 | #46 | |
| fasttense | Jan 27 | #11 | |
| LeftinOH | Jan 27 | #15 | |
| HughBeaumont | Jan 27 | #16 | |
| TheCowsCameHome | Jan 27 | #17 | |
| TalkingDog | Jan 27 | #19 | |
| judesedit | Jan 27 | #20 | |
| judesedit | Jan 27 | #21 | |
| INdemo | Tuesday | #164 | |
| Moostache | Jan 27 | #49 | |
| Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 27 | #23 | |
| calimary | Jan 28 | #127 | |
| Madmiddle | Jan 27 | #24 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #25 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #30 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #32 | |
| wordpix | Jan 27 | #39 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #42 | |
| wordpix | Jan 27 | #50 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #55 | |
| wordpix | Jan 27 | #64 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #65 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 29 | #146 | |
| wordpix | Jan 29 | #158 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #53 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #59 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #76 | |
| kurtzapril4 | Jan 27 | #123 | |
| stonecutter357 | Jan 27 | #99 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Jan 28 | #139 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 28 | #142 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 27 | #116 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Jan 28 | #144 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 29 | #148 | |
| onenote | Jan 27 | #91 | |
| Hugabear | Jan 27 | #78 | |
| slackmaster | Jan 27 | #96 | |
| Hugabear | Jan 27 | #98 | |
| slackmaster | Jan 27 | #101 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #106 | |
| Hoyt | Jan 27 | #94 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #105 | |
| Hoyt | Jan 27 | #111 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #117 | |
| Hoyt | Jan 27 | #118 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #120 | |
| Wait Wut | Jan 27 | #27 | |
| Ken Burch | Jan 27 | #28 | |
| Nihil | Jan 27 | #40 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #29 | |
| Johnson20 | Jan 27 | #71 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #75 | |
| Johnson20 | Jan 27 | #77 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #93 | |
| Hoyt | Jan 27 | #95 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 28 | #143 | |
| Johnson20 | Jan 28 | #135 | |
| Hugabear | Jan 27 | #100 | |
| Johnson20 | Jan 28 | #136 | |
| Hugabear | Jan 28 | #138 | |
| Johnson20 | Jan 29 | #150 | |
| Hugabear | Jan 29 | #157 | |
| INdemo | Jan 27 | #31 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #34 | |
| jpak | Jan 27 | #35 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #36 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 27 | #41 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #43 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 27 | #45 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #47 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 27 | #51 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #61 | |
| newspeak | Jan 27 | #58 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #62 | |
| Dreamer Tatum | Jan 27 | #87 | |
| Hassin Bin Sober | Jan 28 | #140 | |
| Dreamer Tatum | Jan 29 | #152 | |
| Spirochete | Jan 27 | #125 | |
| COLGATE4 | Jan 27 | #33 | |
| peace frog | Jan 27 | #37 | |
| Loge23 | Jan 27 | #38 | |
| SpankMe | Jan 27 | #44 | |
| yellowcanine | Jan 27 | #54 | |
| Ian David | Jan 27 | #57 | |
| mistertrickster | Jan 27 | #60 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #63 | |
| freshwest | Jan 27 | #66 | |
| 2kevlane | Jan 27 | #85 | |
| freshwest | Jan 27 | #124 | |
| bathroommonkey76 | Jan 27 | #67 | |
| Johnson20 | Jan 27 | #89 | |
| MountainLaurel | Jan 27 | #68 | |
| GoldenOldie | Jan 27 | #69 | |
| SoapBox | Jan 27 | #70 | |
| NBachers | Jan 27 | #73 | |
| JJW | Jan 27 | #74 | |
| tawadi | Jan 27 | #79 | |
| DreamSmoker | Jan 27 | #81 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 27 | #108 | |
| 2kevlane | Jan 27 | #84 | |
| bayareaboy | Jan 27 | #90 | |
| BVL1994 | Jan 27 | #103 | |
| Initech | Jan 27 | #97 | |
| fascisthunter | Jan 27 | #102 | |
| Faygo Kid | Jan 27 | #104 | |
| dsharp88 | Jan 27 | #107 | |
| tropicanarose | Jan 27 | #113 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 27 | #114 | |
| That Guy 888 | Jan 28 | #132 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 28 | #134 | |
| That Guy 888 | Jan 29 | #145 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 29 | #147 | |
| That Guy 888 | Jan 29 | #151 | |
| ProgressiveProfessor | Jan 29 | #153 | |
| That Guy 888 | Jan 29 | #161 | |
| Nevernose | Jan 27 | #119 | |
| gopiscrap | Jan 27 | #121 | |
| jake123 | Jan 27 | #122 | |
| Bette Noir | Jan 28 | #128 | |
| Zippydo77 | Jan 28 | #130 | |
| newspeak | Jan 28 | #133 | |
| SemperEadem | Jan 28 | #141 | |
| Fearless | Jan 29 | #149 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 29 | #154 | |
| Fearless | Jan 29 | #156 | |
| Fearless | Jan 29 | #159 | |
| PavePusher | Jan 29 | #160 | |
| BiggJawn | Jan 29 | #155 | |
| New7up | Jan 29 | #162 |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:32 AM
Ecumenist (4,100 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
1. God, they're stupid.
|
Funny how you didn't see things like this from us during Idiot McCrackpipe's residency and seems like we see at least 2 a week.
|
Response to Ecumenist (Reply #1)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:09 AM
Gman (20,070 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
13. Refer back to the thread on low intelligence of conservatives
|
Just another piece of supporting evidence
|
Response to Ecumenist (Reply #1)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:37 PM
24601 (1,961 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
109. Oh, I didn't realize that the 2006 movie, "Death of a President" was a right wing production
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:38 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Perhaps because it wasn't.
Memories are very short around here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_a_President_(2006_film) Updated to add URL |
Response to 24601 (Reply #109)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:04 PM
Ecumenist (4,100 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
112. WTF are you talking about? First of all, it was MOCKUMENTARY NOT
|
a statement of what people are planning to do by individuals. It was also produced by BRITS!!!! This is the latest in a long stream of overtly threatening and/or racists things done by AMERICAN right wing idiots. BIG DIFFERENCE! Don't play stupid. That's a real reach...
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:38 AM
LostinRed (337 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. good
|
I'm sick of the disrespect that these freaks show for the office of the President. I don't remember seeing pictrures of any liberals shooting images of the worst President Ever (George W. Bush). We may have had disrespect for George but not the office of the President.
|
Response to LostinRed (Reply #2)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:47 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
22. I do...going back to Reagan. Then again it was mostly dart boards
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:47 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #22)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:49 PM
BrendaBrick (934 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
82. I seem to remember episodes of the sitcom 'Murphy Brown'
|
which periodically showed a dartboard on the back of her office door, though I can't recall any of the images
|
Response to LostinRed (Reply #2)
Cliffy44 This message was hidden by Jury decision.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:02 AM
madokie (32,103 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
3. Eight dickheads in need of an asskicking
|
with jail time afterwards
This is my President they're threatening so to me they are threatening me too and I don't like to be threatened |
Response to madokie (Reply #3)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:59 AM
stlsaxman (8,086 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
6. if they do get jail time- the ass-kickings are certain.
|
like a child molester or rapist- the last place you wanna end up is in prison.
|
Response to madokie (Reply #3)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:30 AM
NYC_SKP (39,546 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
18. Their combined IQ is 7, and their combined pee pee length is 5 inches.
|
Yes I did. I went there.
|
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #18)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 05:04 PM
Beartracks (2,237 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
137. "Nice guns. Sorry about your pee pees." n/t
|
================= |
Response to madokie (Reply #3)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:54 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
26. Hyperbole
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) It is not a threat...this has been going on with politicians and public figures for years.
Chill out and use this as the opportunity it is... |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #26)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:06 AM
Paladin (6,581 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
52. Just Wondering, Mr. "Progressive":
|
Is there a bit of far right-wing thuggery you WON'T vigorously defend? |
Response to Paladin (Reply #52)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:11 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
56. Just wondering if you have taken reading comprehension again
|
I have clearly said it is about as stupid as it gets and that we should trumpet it far and wide. If that is "defending" it in your book, its no wonder you are so marginalized
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #56)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:45 PM
dreamnightwind (949 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
126. I think it's more like false equivalence than defending it
|
We just watched Congresswoman Giffords resign, her broken body and unbreakable spirit a testament to the consequences of actions such as this. 2nd amendment remedies. Water the tree of liberty with what? The right wing of this country is violent and has a long history of using that violence against anyone that's different than them. We need to condemn this act loudly, not act like it's balanced out by similar actions of the left, because it's not.
|
Response to dreamnightwind (Reply #126)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:22 AM
calimary (26,398 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
129. Truly. It's not what our side does.
|
Last edited Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:26 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2) I'm sorry. I can't help but make the comparison. Our side chains ourselves to trees and gates of nuclear power plants and stuff. Our side goes on hunger strikes. Our side doesn't go all macho and para-military and "settle things" with guns & ammo. It's just not who we are.
We're not the ones always shoving our gun ownership and our "right to bear arms" in everyone else's faces. We're not the ones out there swaggering around with our six-guns and our holsters. We're not the ones talking openly and longingly, and yes - even ominously and threateningly, about "second amendment remedies." Shit like that comes from the CON side. False equivalency absolutely! It's like comparing a brick to a grain of aquarium gravel and saying they're both alike. And you better believe some idiot pundit will try to make that comparison as they all do. These guys are domestic terrorists. These guys need to be taken into custody for making threats against the President. They're manifestly dangerous and reckless as hell! What's to stop one of them in some macho lather from trying to prove how much more alpha-male he is than all the other Yosemite Sam wannabes? These guys are a threat to society! |
Response to calimary (Reply #129)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:42 AM
dreamnightwind (949 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
131. Yeah, it's a seed you don't want planted
|
"What's to stop one of them in some macho lather from trying to prove how much more alpha-male he is than all the other Yosemite Sam wannabes?" Indeed, or one of the thousands of small-brained big-gun Loughners who never had an original thought of their own that are chuckling at this pic on the internet then deludes himself into thinking he has a brilliant idea... |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #26)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:59 PM
Hoyt (5,218 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
92. Just members of the right wing "gun culture" having a big old time. Screw em.
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:05 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #26)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:43 PM
SunSeeker (147 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
110. Check your grammar, "Professor." n/t
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #110)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:17 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
115. Thank you
|
The English language needs a compiler like the other important ones have
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:07 AM
onehandle (28,547 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
4. Gunstremists.
|
I am so shocked.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:49 AM
TxVietVet (1,186 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
5. The teabaggin' kkkluckers seem to forget something...........
|
Some of their opposition have been trained in the use of weapons of war, own them and will not hessitate to return fire.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:03 AM
deutsey (14,911 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
7. Dumbasses n/t
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:06 AM
secondwind (3,151 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
8. Love the guy on the right, with the semi-automatic...
|
His T-shirt reads JUST DO IT. |
Response to secondwind (Reply #8)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:54 PM
emulatorloo (22,316 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
83. Yep. "JUST DO IT"
Response to secondwind (Reply #8)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:35 PM
caveat_imperator (60 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
86. I'm wondering when the guy on the left is gonna shoot his own foot off.
|
|
Response to caveat_imperator (Reply #86)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:11 PM
ThomThom (859 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
88. or the guy with pistol shooting the guy next to him
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:33 AM
JustABozoOnThisBus (8,330 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
9. "... LET this get posted"? Dumb Facebook question ...
|
The comments in the OP indicated that Sgt Shearer "let" this get posted on his Facebook page. Can other people post a picture on somebody's Facebook page, or is that limited to the "owner" of the page? I figured if it was on Sgt Shearer's page, then Sgt Shearer had to post it.
This seems like weak security in Facebook. Or is it a "setting"? I'm not a Facebook user, though I admit to sometimes enjoying "Failbook". First, we had photos from Abu Graib, then Marines pissing on corpses, now this. Dumb. |
Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #9)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:42 AM
The Wizard (5,680 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
10. Pictures have been posted
|
by others on my wall and I don't know how to delete them. It's a Facebook flaw. Facebook has several flaws. Too many bells, whistles and distractions.
|
Response to The Wizard (Reply #10)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:10 AM
obamanut2012 (1,531 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
14. You can have your account settings not allow that
Response to The Wizard (Reply #10)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:02 AM
rocktivity (33,057 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
48. Posting on your wall is one thing
|
The article doesn't say if it was part of a post on his wall or in his personal gallery.
rockivity |
Response to The Wizard (Reply #10)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:17 PM
MH1 (12,067 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
72. You should be able to delete them. If you can't delete them,
|
ask the person who posted them to delete them.
If all else fails, I think if you block a person it will delete any stuff they posted off your wall. (I'm not 100% sure but I think it does.) You could always unblock and re-add them back if it's someone you want to keep as a 'friend'. Presumably anyone in that category will understand and comply if you let them know you don't want the picture on your wall for some reason. (Tell them it's because you have friends from work or something.) |
Response to MH1 (Reply #72)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:19 PM
The Wizard (5,680 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
80. fixed (NT)
Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #9)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:09 AM
obamanut2012 (1,531 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
12. You have to approve photos posted to your wall by others
|
Before they are actually made public on your wall. I do not always approve what people want to put on my wall.
|
Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #9)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:57 AM
Mz Pip (22,671 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
46. You can post on other's pages
|
but you have to be on Facebook, be a "friend" and it's not anonymous.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:52 AM
fasttense (13,045 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
11. Is the idiot on the left about to shoot their foot off? It looks like it. n/t
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:11 AM
LeftinOH (3,815 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
15. Yep- that's bunch of real macho he-man badasses right there...
|
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:23 AM
HughBeaumont (18,061 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
16. DU-Friendly adjectives fail me.
|
Implied assassination. Classic.
Anyone still want to play the "we do the same thing" false equivalency card? |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:24 AM
TheCowsCameHome (24,049 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
17. Seven losers toting deadly weapons
|
what a sickening thought.
Oops! The dumb fuck in the middle is about to blow red-shirt away - Correction: make that six losers. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:38 AM
TalkingDog (6,235 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
19. The fact that it's a tee shirt implies they did violence to an Obama supporter.
|
I think I'd be looking for bodies at that ranch.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:42 AM
judesedit (470 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
20. Look at them. If any ONE man every confronted them, they'd run like babies....unless, of course,
|
they had a gun in their hand. Who or what the hell ever gave white, especially males, the idea that they were/are any better than ANYONE else????? That's my question. This is just an example of their lack of education and their prejudice, which may have stemmed from the same illiterate upbringing. I know the Bible NEVER said white people are any better. They claim to be Christians and love God so much, yet they practice the exact OPPOSITE of what the Bible teaches. Jesus and all of the saints are crying. I sure wish they'd wake the hell up. They make me ashamed to be white.
|
Response to judesedit (Reply #20)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:46 AM
judesedit (470 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
21. Just one more reason NOT to vote for a conservative. Need I say more?
|
.
|
Response to judesedit (Reply #21)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 10:38 PM
INdemo (2,666 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
164. There is no such thing as a conservative anymore
|
the GOP has been hijacked by the radical right..They could be called Teabaggers,TeaParty or corporatecronies but the GOP known as/for conservatives dont exist..Its getting scarey to watch and listen to these people with their hate messages.
I mean it is very scarey to know we cant hide from our children the kind of hate that is out there with these radicals ...but they blame it on us liberals...What kind of world do we live in when a young girl is handcuffed and tasered, falls to the ground and now braindead and it is justified by the law enforcement group and the corporate media..what kind of hate do we live in now..It is really scarey..We lock our kids in school to protect them yet .we may walk through a mall parking lot and never return home because a police officer thinks we are radical protesters and taser us..And right now these right wing idiot candidates are spreading nothing but hate messages.Sanatorum and now Romney has turned up his rhetoric. This is what the billions of dollors is buying that we ,the working class American gave up our livelyhood for so banks and Wall St could build more wealth for these people to spend millions to spread this hate... |
Response to judesedit (Reply #20)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:02 AM
Moostache (952 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
49. These are exhibits 1-8 (including the jag-off with the camera)...
|
of why I despise Christian hypocrites.
The central message of Christ was LOVE. Love your neighbor, love your enemy, love your god. The central message of these super-bigots is HATE. Hate the gays. Hate the blacks. Hate the liberals. These asshats have more likely than not NEVER read the bible, NEVER understood anything beyond "loves you some Jeebus or into the fire of Hell you go - and by the way, hate you some gays today!", and NEVER gotten a grip on WHY they have no future, no jobs and no education (here's a BIG ASS hint for them - it AIN'T the policies of the man whose picture they just shot up). I guarantee you that if we identified all 8 people from that incident, within 1 year one of them will be in jail, within 2 years one or more of them will be dead and within a decade ALL of them will be bitter, angry men with guns blaming everyone else for their clearly self-inflicted problems....not exactly a future MENSA members meeting going on there... |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:47 AM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (10,442 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
23. If they want to shoot guns so badly, send them to Afghanistan. Tired of these
|
racist rednecks!
|
Response to Liberal_Stalwart71 (Reply #23)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:15 AM
calimary (26,398 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
127. Or Somalia.
|
Last edited Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:16 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Let 'em enjoy all that anarchy they think they worship, adore, and yearn for, so much. Gee - maybe they'll go for that self-deportation thing of romney's?
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:52 AM
Madmiddle (18 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
24. These
|
kids are not savvy enough to know why this is a bad thing, they're influence at home is where this starts. The cop that posted this will be fired or answer to the secret service who doesn't really ask why, they just look at the picture and see a threat and deal with the threat on the same level.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:52 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
25. This has been going on for multiple presidents and other public figures since I can remember
|
It is not a qualified threat. If anything its political speech. What if they had burned the picture or did something else in effigy?
The posting of it by a cop is about as dumb as it gets, but again, its legal. Of course its dumb, stupid, etc, but stupidity is allowed. It is also a golden opportunity to for us as his supporters to spread it far and wide, and we shall. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #25)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:01 AM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
30. What horseshit - this is not "political speech" It's gun nut douchebaggery
|
yup
|
Response to jpak (Reply #30)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:17 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
32. Its right wing nuts behaving stupidly, but under the law, its political speech
|
since there was no real threat expressed, just a mutilated piece of paper.
Firearms are not a key point here...they could have defecated on it, or burned it...same thing. Its a great PR piece we can use...run with it. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #32)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:38 AM
wordpix (9,979 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
39. disagree, firearms ARE a key point here. The numbskulls are holding guns with pic of shot up Pres.O
|
Professor, as I'm sure you know, students are taught to consider the significance/implication of things that might not be outwardly stated.
|
Response to wordpix (Reply #39)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:51 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
42. Not from a legal perspective or a practical one...
|
Its not a real threat, it will not be treated like one. The defense for it is political speech and it is a valid one in the US
The results will look something like this: - The cop will take some heat on the job, most likely unofficially - The school will say they can do nothing (which is true) - There will be no Secret Service investigation. They will file it with the thousands like it that have happen since at least Reagan Its a PR coup for the President's supporters and little more. Trying to make more of it than that is dumb...but not as dumb as they are. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #42)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:02 AM
wordpix (9,979 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
50. however, this being AZ, this should not be taken lightly IMO
|
Gabby Giffords, remember?
|
Response to wordpix (Reply #50)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:08 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
55. There is no tie to Giffords. It could have happened in any state in the union
|
Redneck idiots are not limited to the Arizona, the West, or the South. We even have our share here in SoCal.
This is a PR gift. Lets run with it for what it is. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #55)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:32 AM
wordpix (9,979 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
64. I did not state there was a tie to Giffords, I said it was AZ (land of the gun-toting nutcases)
Response to wordpix (Reply #64)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:36 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
65. My point is that it is AZ has nothing to do with it
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:37 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Its laws are not unique nor its political climate
|
Response to wordpix (Reply #64)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:42 AM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
146. Thanks for the regional bigotry.
|
Now go pound sand.
|
Response to PavePusher (Reply #146)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:14 PM
wordpix (9,979 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
158. It's not bigotry when I read news from AZ & draw my own conclusions
|
I love the AZ desert and mts and seriously consider retiring there someday. But the state is so full of these gun-toting rednecks and t-baggers that I don't think it's the place for me.
I do realize that every state has these types. But in AZ, they appear to be the majority. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #42)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:07 AM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
53. Apologizing for teabagger douchebaggery is just plain stupid
|
yup
|
Response to jpak (Reply #53)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:12 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
59. Then you should quit doing it
|
I think its a PR windfall that we should spread far and wide.
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #59)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:50 PM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
76. lol
|
fail
yup |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #59)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:07 PM
kurtzapril4 (372 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
123. Professor,
|
Quit wasting your breath and time. They don't get it. They don't want to. The poutrage is too fulfilling.
|
Response to jpak (Reply #53)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:15 PM
stonecutter357 (88 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
99. douch
|
douchebaggery.
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #42)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 07:26 PM
Hassin Bin Sober (5,211 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
139. Then you need to brush up on your "legal and practical" skills.
|
There most certainly WILL be a Secret Service investigation.
Where have you been? Can I ask? What do you teach? |
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #139)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:26 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
142. There will be no investigation since there is no threat
|
There might be something perfunctory done since this has hit the media but that would be about it. Despite the poutrage, this has been going on since I can remember. Other posts here have pointed out examples. I have the background to be confident in what I posted.
|
Response to wordpix (Reply #39)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:22 PM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
116. If I posted a picture of myself holding a gun and a shot-up orange juice bottle...
|
would that be proof that I wanted to murder Tropicana employees?
|
Response to PavePusher (Reply #116)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:42 PM
Hassin Bin Sober (5,211 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
144. Is your orange juice bottle a SS protectee?
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #144)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 01:00 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
148. Is a t-shirt a Secret Service protectee?
Response to jpak (Reply #30)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:50 PM
onenote (19,633 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
91. not horseshit.
|
Its just as much protected speech as a picture of Bush with a target superimposed on him or of people burning bush in effigy. Hell, we had a party at which we took a pinata, pasted a photo of bush's face on it, and let people whack it until it burst open. It was no more a crime than if I had set the pinata on a bench and let people throw rocks at, shoot it with a bow and arrow, stick a firecracker up its "ass" or use it for target practice.
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #25)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:08 PM
Hugabear (8,257 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
78. Please provide examples of this happening with previous presidents
|
You asked for citations elsewhere in this thread to back up a poster's claim - well how about it? Can you give citations showing where someone posted bullet-riddled images of sitting presidents, where the Secret Service didn't look into it?
|
Response to Hugabear (Reply #78)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:04 PM
slackmaster (51,680 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
96. Does a bunch of irate Canadians throwing shoes at a burning effigy of George W. Bush count?
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:09 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Or does it have to involve firearms?
![]() |
Response to slackmaster (Reply #96)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:10 PM
Hugabear (8,257 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
98. Show me an example of a bullet-ridden image of Bush, where the Secret Service did not investigate
|
This is the subject of the OP, and the poster I'm responding to says that it's no big deal, happens all the time. I'd like to see an actual example of this happening. The poster demanded someone else back up their claim, so I'm just doing the same thing.
|
Response to Hugabear (Reply #98)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:29 PM
slackmaster (51,680 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
101. So, punching holes in a 2-dimensional image is morally worse than burning a 3-dimensional one?
|
Nobody has been charged with a crime for the incident discussed in the OP.
Freedom of speech includes the right to be a douche bag. The Secret Service certainly has a responsibility to, as is stated in the article, determine the intent of the people involved. All they have to say is that they didn't intend to do any actual harm to the President. |
Response to Hugabear (Reply #98)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:44 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
106. Actually I asked for a data since I could not find one
|
It was interesting as well...though the individuals was found at one point to be mentally incompetent.
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #25)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:01 PM
Hoyt (5,218 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
94. Lots of things are legal, but best left undone. Like a bunch of punks shooting off their weapons.
Response to Hoyt (Reply #94)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:42 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
105. You are letting your weapons phobia interfere with a marvelous PR opportunity for Obama
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #105)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:46 PM
Hoyt (5,218 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
111. Your love of weapons is keeping you from getting outraged at this kind of junk, that is too common.
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:26 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to Hoyt (Reply #111)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:26 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
117. Hardly, I see this as an opportunity
|
I also understand that it is protected political speech, so I save my outrage for things that can be addressed and changed.
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #117)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:30 PM
Hoyt (5,218 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
118. Well it would be nice to see a little outrage, rather than defense of a bunch of punks blasting away
|
at Obama symbols. I know guns are important to you and several others posting in defense of these misfits, but . . . . . . |
Response to Hoyt (Reply #118)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:56 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
120. So urinating or defecating on it would have been okay by you just as long as it wasn't firearms?
|
I am not defending this...I am chortling at a PR windfall that we should make the most of
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:55 AM
Wait Wut (2,641 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
27. Just by looking at the pic...
|
...I knew this was Arizona. This state is full of these idiots. Wouldn't be surprised if the good Sgt. was the one behind the camera.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:59 AM
Ken Burch (25,788 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
28. Prediction:
|
At least one GOP presidential candidate will say "they're just kids".
|
Response to Ken Burch (Reply #28)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:49 AM
Nihil (10,173 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
40. No doubt claiming that they are "progressive" too ...
|
... and that it is clearly protected political speech ...
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:59 AM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
29. GOP/NRA gun nut thugs
|
yup
|
Response to jpak (Reply #29)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:15 PM
Johnson20 (224 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
71. Painting with sort of a broad brush aren't we?n/t
Response to Johnson20 (Reply #71)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:49 PM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
75. OK - I will redefine them - teabagger douchebag GOP/NRA gun nuts
|
better?
|
Response to jpak (Reply #75)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:08 PM
Johnson20 (224 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
77. Nope. Rather bigoted in my humble opinion. n/t
Response to Johnson20 (Reply #77)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:00 PM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
93. The bigots are holding the guns
|
yup
|
Response to jpak (Reply #93)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:02 PM
Hoyt (5,218 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
95. Exactly. And bigots and guns seem to go together in this country.
Response to Hoyt (Reply #95)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:29 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
143. Tell that to the Pink Pistols
Response to jpak (Reply #93)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:43 PM
Johnson20 (224 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
135. Where did you read anything about that, not in the OP's article?n/t
Response to jpak (Reply #75)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:16 PM
Hugabear (8,257 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
100. What's bigoted about a group of armed white men shooting up a photo of a black president?
"What do you mean, I'm a bigot?" |
Response to Hugabear (Reply #100)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:57 PM
Johnson20 (224 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
136. Sorry, but I won't leap to
|
that sort of conclusion based on a single photograph. Just curious, but how did you reach your conclusion, assuming you comment was sarcasm.
|
Response to Johnson20 (Reply #136)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:53 PM
Hugabear (8,257 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
138. Do you deny that most of the anti-Obama hatred is racially motivated?
|
Many teabaggers claim they opposed Bush's actions. Yet they didn't take to the streets until Obama was elected. Many of the teabagger rallies featured explicitly racist protest signs. The right-wing throws around racially tinged barbs like "food stamp president".
So yeah, when I see a group of armed white guys holding a bullet-riddled image of Obama, I'm going to say there is probably a racial element there. |
Response to Hugabear (Reply #138)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 11:04 AM
Johnson20 (224 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
150. Yes, I do. I believe, for the most part, it is politically, not racily motovated. n/t
Response to Johnson20 (Reply #150)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:11 PM
Hugabear (8,257 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
157. You have got to be fucking kidding me.
|
Not racially motivated?
They hated Clinton - but never took to the streets in protest of him. They claim they didn't approve of Bush's spending - but never took to the streets in protest. But for Obama, somehow they just feel the need to take to the streets. There's also the whole "birther" debate which is most definitely racist.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:08 AM
INdemo (2,666 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
31. If this would have happened when Bush was President ..wouldn't these idiots be in jail already?
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:19 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2) I think so...The police officer most definately should be fired..Isnt Arizona the state where the Gov pointed her finger in the Presidnets face?..Maybe these idiots picked up on that anger and posed for this???
|
Response to INdemo (Reply #31)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:20 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
34. No
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:55 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) This is not a credible threat, been happening in one form or another since I can remember. I remember some pretty sordid things done to Chimpy pictures...
Not sure the cop can be fired. Its legal conduct off hours. However he will get some grief for it at work, most likely unofficially. The event in the picture I believe happened before the finger incident. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #34)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:25 AM
jpak (24,919 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
35. Yes - People were sentenced to jail time for far less during the Bush regime
|
yup
|
Response to jpak (Reply #35)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:28 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
36. And you have on point citiations for that?
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #36)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:51 AM
rocktivity (33,057 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
41. I do recall someone getting sentenced to nearly three years in jail for making a reference
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:56 AM USA/ET - Edit history (4) |
Response to rocktivity (Reply #41)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:53 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
43. Do you have a citation in context?
|
I remember reading about someone who talked to a burning bush, but I think he went to heaven after a road trip.
|
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #43)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:57 AM
rocktivity (33,057 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
45. Found a link to the story that works.
|
And I guess the cops had enough of a citation in context to get a conviction.
rocktivity |
Response to rocktivity (Reply #45)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:00 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
47. Then post it
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #47)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:05 AM
rocktivity (33,057 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
51. This what he was busted for
|
whether you consider it legally justified or not:
The bizarre tale of Richard Humphreys began in the early hours of March 9, 2001, in a Watertown, S.D., bar. During a lively chat with a truck driver, the former Portland cabbie--who calls himself The Prophet Israel Humphreys--cracked a joke that didn't get the laughs he had anticipated.
"I said that God might speak to the world through a burning Bush," Humphreys, 50, later testified in federal court. "I thought it was funny. It was prophetizing." Knowing President George W. Bush was scheduled to visit nearby Sioux Falls the next day, a bartender reported Humphreys' comment to local police, claiming that Humphreys alluded to the possibility of someone pouring a flammable liquid on the president and lighting it. Local police took Humphreys into custody at his Sioux Falls motel just hours before Bush arrived. http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-1622-no_laughing_matter.html rocktivity |
Response to rocktivity (Reply #51)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:20 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
61. Interesting read
|
While not on point (defacing an image with firearms), for this bubba it was also more than the joke in the bar. He had a long history of threatening behaviors and was also temporarily deemed mentally unfit to stand trial...
Bear in mind, the courts have upheld image defacement, burning in effigy, flag burning, and similar items as political speech. Not my call, its theirs. Thanks |
Response to rocktivity (Reply #41)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:11 AM
newspeak (4,216 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
58. yes, a man made a joke about a burning bush
|
and was given jail time. I find this more disturbing than telling a joke.
|
Response to newspeak (Reply #58)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:21 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
62. The link above was an interesing read about that
Response to INdemo (Reply #31)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:45 PM
Dreamer Tatum (6,302 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
87. Um - a MOVIE was made about Bush getting shot.
|
And the prevailing attitude here at that time was "hey, free speech!"
|
Response to Dreamer Tatum (Reply #87)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 07:29 PM
Hassin Bin Sober (5,211 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
140. There was also a movie made about the earth being smashed by an asteroid...
|
...but no one is for investigating Morgan Freeman.
(Hey my example is just as stupid as yours) |
Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #140)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:10 PM
Dreamer Tatum (6,302 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
152. Yeah...let anyone make a faux documentary about Obama being shot
|
and let's see how that plays.
Hypocrisy: not just for breakfast anymore. |
Response to INdemo (Reply #31)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:53 PM
Spirochete (3,817 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
125. Are you kidding?
|
Ten years ago someone got sent to prison for saying something about a "burning Bush". Under those standards, these pinheads should all be serving time,
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:18 AM
COLGATE4 (2,910 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
33. Is there something in the air or water
|
in Arizona that makes it the home of so many whackadoos?
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Reply #33)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:30 AM
peace frog (5,262 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
37. AZ does appear to be a wingnut magnet
|
perhaps the state has been a safe haven for these whackjobs.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:37 AM
Loge23 (2,932 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
38. Terrorists.
|
Maybe a trip to Quantanamo would be in order?
After all, we hold many there without any cause whatsoever. Why should we ignore this? |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:57 AM
SpankMe (319 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
44. If Bush was in office...
|
...and this was a group of black nationalists with guns and a shot-up picture of Bush, how much do you want to bet there'd be ATF and FBI raiding parties busting down doors?
Since a Democrat is the subject of the "protest" in this case, this will be characterized as "protected, if not somewhat misguided, political dissent". |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:07 AM
yellowcanine (20,604 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
54. "And a police officer willfully let this get posted on his Facebook?" Do we know that?
|
I think we need to be careful here. The guy may indeed be a whack job but just because someone posts a picture on your face book wall doesn't mean you endorsed it. This was apparently also on someone else's wall also so it could be that someone posted it on the officer's wall without his knowledge. Some people aren't very Facebook savvy in terms of controlling what might get put on your wall. And if one is like me, I am not in there checking every day so something might stay up a while before I am aware of it and can remove it.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:11 AM
Ian David (64,623 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
57. More TeaTerror
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:17 AM
mistertrickster (6,819 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
60. Not very good shots either, from the looks of it. nt
Response to mistertrickster (Reply #60)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:22 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
63. And as others have pointed out, their gun safety is not so hot either.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:40 AM
freshwest (7,968 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
66. Loughners in training. Giffords' father said if she got hurt, it'd be by a Teabagger, since the...
|
Campaign against her was so vicious, even a black GOP official resigned because of intimidation at the time.
After she was shot, one of the shooting victims who protested a man yelling at a meeting about how Giffords' group should have been armed, was the one arrested and charged for disorderly conduct, not the belligerent bully. Then came the call nationally from the right for her to give up her seat to someone who was competent, when the GOP has held wheelchair bound senile leaders in office for decades, or taken vacations for months on end. From Sarah Palin's gunsights on Giffords' district after years of hate radio calling for all liberals to be killed, they achieved their aim, as a teabagger will likely take her seat. Stochastic terrorism works, and the thugs smell blood in the water of our consciousness. This won't stop. From terrorist threats and acts against liberals nationally, Gabby's leaving is a victory for them. These are the same ilk that want to shoot immigrants from helicopters like hunters shoot wolves in Alaska. Like those who kill on video games and earn points, after a time, there is little difference between the game and the fantasy and the act itself. Like watching snuff porn, imagination will no longer satisfy, it will have to be carried out in real life. Jesus said that what we feel in our hearts is what we will be condemned for, long before the act wanted is committed, or even if it is not. On some level, these people with the help of the GOP are making their reality ours, and we are being led like lambs to the slaughter. Like cheering the death of the little nine year old girl by Loughner, posters on Sarah Palin's page said: "It's ok. Christina Taylor Green was probably going to end up a left wing bleeding heart liberal anyway. Hey, as 'they' say, what would you do if you had the chance to kill Hitler as a kid? Exactly." Written by young people, taken down eventually, but left there long enough for many of them to still feel the rush of victory over the evil liberals. The link to the blog with the screenshots has now been deleted by AOL, but the tenor of the time is described halfway down the page here at this link: http://www.the-richmonder.com/2011_01_01_archive.html But, nothing to worry about. We have the editor of a paper in Atlanta calling for Obama to be killed, a child's pet slaughtered and other acts of terrorism. All of these people are rightwing, and it'll be worse as the election nears. Just repeat after me: There is no connection between speech and action, there is no such thing as a mob mentality. 'It can't happen here.' 'I try to believe in as many as six impossible things before breakfast.' |
Response to freshwest (Reply #66)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:12 PM
2kevlane (2 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
85. Amen.
Response to 2kevlane (Reply #85)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:31 PM
freshwest (7,968 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
124. Thanks. Like your profile. Welcome to DU.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:42 AM
bathroommonkey76 (204 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
67. The bigger the gun, the smaller the penis. nt
Response to bathroommonkey76 (Reply #67)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:39 PM
Johnson20 (224 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
89. And just how would you know that? Just curious is all. n/t
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:57 AM
MountainLaurel (9,928 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
68. Arizona
|
Who would have thought?
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:08 PM
GoldenOldie (1,450 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
69. "trip to the ranch"????
|
Seems like Sgt Pat Shearer, learned nothing from the shootings in Tucson Arizona. Nor was he willing or capable of teaching these young men about integrity, or what it means to be a citizen in our Democracy.
I look at this photo of these uniformed young men, being used by an adult, officer-of-the-law, and look at the highschool photo of Jared-Lee-Loughner (the lone shooter in the Tucson tragedy). Jared's face could be in that group and no one could tell that he was fighting mental demons. Is Sgt. Pat Shearer, capable of knowing if any one of these young men has mental demons fighting within their heads just waiting to explode and his actions and teachings gave them an out. Yes, Jared-Lee-Loughner, has severe mental problems which seemed to erupt the older he became yet will we ever know if the Sarah Palin's campaign ads of targeting Gabby Giffords with a gun and scope, or if the Republican opponent against Gabby, Jesse Kelley campaign event at which voters, could shoot an assault rifle with Gabby, the Democratic candidate as the target, register within the mentally disturbed mind of Jared. I lived on a "ranch," nothing about ranch life, target practice, involved targeting another real person. This is simple and pure hate and teaching it to young people is unforgiveable and moreso in Arizona. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:14 PM
SoapBox (2,974 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
70. Gee, I wonder how Nike feels about all that promotion (the green shirt on the doofus to the right)?
|
...nice.
Not. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:31 PM
NBachers (2,505 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
73. So will Jan Brewer shake her claw in the faces of these violent gun thugs?
|
Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) "Just Do It" with the gun and the "Hope" shirt = "Just Shoot President Obama"
And he was just there in Arizona. This reminds me of the Wanted posters that showed up in Dallas as President Kennedy was scheduled to visit . . . Hey Secret Service - This is a credible threat to the life of President Obama. You all know better than we what's happening in this country - Please be vigilant. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:35 PM
JJW (1,366 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
74. Looks like they're going rogue
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:15 PM
tawadi (1,194 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
79. Not sure whether to rec this for its sheer stupidity or hide it because its so sickening. eom
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:38 PM
DreamSmoker (494 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
81. Now I really don't feel safe
|
These are the Law in Arizona???
If you or I had possession of those two weapons they are displaying here in California??? We would be arrested under Felony charges... Its quit obvious these Boys are making a political statement... Guns and Bullet holes on a pic of the president by this Group is scarey... Can you imagine how the Hispanic Americans feel in Arizona??? |
Response to DreamSmoker (Reply #81)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:50 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
108. Minor point on CA law
|
The firearms in question may or may not be illegal in CA. There was a grandfathering clause in the legislation and allowed models were tightened up considerably after the legislature figured out the original version had many omissions.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:56 PM
2kevlane (2 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
84. Damn glad I don't live there.
|
What is wrong with our society? How can someone like this be allowed to protect and serve? I hope he loses his position and everyone one of those idiots gets investigated. If I was Hispanic I wouldn't want this guy pulling me over!
|
Response to 2kevlane (Reply #84)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:40 PM
bayareaboy (77 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
90. Hell I won't even travel there...
|
I have been retired for years, I always go north to Oregon, Washington, and BC. Between jerk-offs like Sheriff Joe and Missy finger in the face, they ain't gonna get my money. |
Response to 2kevlane (Reply #84)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 05:33 PM
BVL1994 (1 post) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
103. sorry
|
3 of those kids are mexican buddy
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:05 PM
Initech (30,303 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
97. Douchebags. I hope the SS kicks their ass and takes names.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 05:14 PM
fascisthunter (26,190 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
102. Hey Tough Guys? So What was the Point/message?
|
That you are young and stupid and think shooting guns at a target with a politicians face on it is macho, or gonna make you hip in the circles you hang out in? How stupid...
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:39 PM
Faygo Kid (18,822 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
104. These dittoheads have never known a time without hate radio.
|
They are well trained in hate. What a year this will be.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:48 PM
dsharp88 (184 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
107. It's just today's threat of violence by conservatives..
|
same old, same old... nothing new to see here.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:09 PM
tropicanarose (231 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
113. God. This is frightening! When will this incendiary rhetoric stop?! haven't we had enough tragedy?
|
I am glad that the Secret Service are looking into it. We have so many examples of this kind of hateful, violent crud in the press every week. The story earlier this week about the AK campaign workers cat being slaughtered and painted with the word "liberal" made me so sick that I couldn't go to sleep. That was a hate crime and unspeakable cruelty and must be punished--this is threatening political warfare and it must stop. I hope that they fire everyone associated with this thing. They must be punished.
This makes me sick. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:16 PM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
114. How about this?
|
And don't think I'm trying to defend the Shrub. But google "Bush, effigy, burn" and you get a lot of hits for the U.S. alone. |
Response to PavePusher (Reply #114)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:17 PM
That Guy 888 (199 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
132. Nope. Try looking up the definition of "burned in effigy". Here are a couple:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and Miriam-Webster: ef·fi·gy So if they had burned an effigy of the President, you would have a point. |
Response to That Guy 888 (Reply #132)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:31 PM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
134. Distinction without a difference?
|
I don't see your point here. Can you please break it down for me? TIA.
|
Response to PavePusher (Reply #134)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:39 AM
That Guy 888 (199 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
145. You are trying to compare the "shooters" to people who burned bush in effigy, right?
|
Burning an effigy of someone has a history hundreds of years old as political protest. People don't burn effigies in order to intimidate someone or to practice setting the person on fire.
Shooting an image of someone can be an implied threat in the form of target practice for shooting the actual person. I remember reading about a few investigations where pictures shot were considered a threat (federal judges, representatives) but of course it was just someone blowing off steam. In a couple of hundred years maybe shooting up someone's picture will be seen in the same way as burning someone in effigy, but for now it may get you a Secret Service visit. |
Response to That Guy 888 (Reply #145)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:58 AM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
147. I'm pretty sure that shooting a picture of someone...
|
can be entirely as symbolic as burning an effigy.
"People don't burn effigies in order to intimidate someone..." Really? Than what's the point? And how do you prove your assertion? |
Response to PavePusher (Reply #147)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:05 PM
That Guy 888 (199 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
151. Try reading my posts a little more carefully
"I'm pretty sure that shooting a picture of someone... can be entirely as symbolic as burning an effigy. " From post 147 which you are replying to: I remember reading about a few investigations where pictures shot were considered a threat (federal judges, representatives) but of course it was just someone blowing off steam. AND In a couple of hundred years maybe shooting up someone's picture will be seen in the same way as burning someone in effigy, but for now it may get you a Secret Service visit. People don't burn effigies in order to intimidate someone... "Really? Than what's the point?" From post 132 above: ...An effigy can also be a doll burned in order to dispel undesired spirits or to advocate against a person. AND Political effigies serve a broadly similar purpose on political demonstrations... "And how do you prove your assertion?" Hundreds of years of history. Try this link to wikipedia about effigies. Look at the example in post 132 above from Miriam-Webster <the football coach was burned in effigy> . Do you think the coach in the example feels physically threatened? How about "psyched out"? Are you now saying that burning effigies and shooting peoples pictures is for intimidation and not symbolic expression? How do you prove that people are intimidated by effigies being burnt? Do you mean unnerved or feeling that their physical well being is in danger? Do you acknowledge that they are different? Before posting a reply with more questions, please check to make sure they were not already answered. |
Response to That Guy 888 (Reply #151)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 01:22 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (15,526 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
153. Try reading history a liitle more carefully
|
Burning in effigy is a symbolic destruction of the individual and what they stand for historically.
Wikipedia, while useful has its limits and proof texting from it is silly. |
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #153)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 08:54 PM
That Guy 888 (199 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
161. Professor, please cite your historical evidence
|
You do understand that a message board has different standards than any online course that you may teach? While Wikipedia is not an accepted information source for college (or possibly even high school) papers, this is neither. In my case I do not like to throw opinion out there without providing at least some "proof" for it. As for the "isolated quotes" or proof-texting, I don't think they were misleading and were done simply to keep within the "four paragraphs" rule. The shorter quotes in the post you responded to were to emphasize what PavePusher seems to have missed in previous posts. If you feel something is taken out of context please point it out.
I assume you have a link to a source that backs up your statement about the singular historical definition of effigies which is freely accessible to non-academics? One last question: I think I made it clear that burning someone in effigy is not considered a physical threat to someone. Why bother to post since you note that it is symbolic, and further up the the thread(post#61), you acknowledge that the courts do not view "burning someone in effigy" as a threat to their person? |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:38 PM
Nevernose (8,103 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
119. It seems way more threatening to those who might WEAR such a shirt
|
Someone like me.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:38 PM
gopiscrap (1,069 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
121. this is a real problem
|
not responding to this shit hard...gives the impression that it's ok to be violent towards elected officials.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
jake123 This message was hidden by Jury decision.
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:19 AM
Bette Noir (3,155 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
128. I'm worried about the guy on the right.
|
His t-shirt says "Just Do It," and he's holding an assault rifle. Not a good combo.
|
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:35 AM
Zippydo77 (4 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
130. Yep, bad idea
|
Yes,
Looking like a 'white boy gangster outfit' with that picture shot up is a BAD idea. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:23 PM
newspeak (4,216 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
133. for those who say both sides do it
|
let's look at some of the fallout from the hate blatherings of talking heads like o'lliely, beck and hannity. A right wing nut shoots up a UU church, wants to kill him some liberals-his reading material, right wing hate spewers. A right wing radio talking head in denver remarks about harming a progressive radio commentator and one of his ignorant shoots the progressive to death. O'lliely talks about going after doctors who provide safe abortions and a doctor is shot to death in church. A democratic campaign manager comes home and finds his cat dead with "liberal" knifed into it. And giffords, along with others, including a child is shot by a very disturbed man.
The corporate media gives access to these blowhards-they pay them to spew bigotry, ignorance and fear; and they divide us. To me, they also incite fools to commit acts of terror on anyone who doesn't believe the way they do. And the difference is, yeah, some people have used voodoo dolls, burned effigies and the like of little boots, especially after he put our soldiers in harms way needlessly, gave his friends lucrative contracts (our money), squandered money while the decent jobs were disappearing. But, what the left didn't do is ACT out by harming others. That's been left up to the right wing wackos. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 09:05 PM
SemperEadem (6,341 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
141. They should have read the story of Sir Anthony Babbington
|
at least they don't employ the full horrors of the traitor's death these days,.
Just real, real stupid. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 01:20 AM
Fearless (9,241 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
149. Looks like someone's getting a visit from the NSA.
Response to Fearless (Reply #149)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 02:05 PM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
154. Huh? What would the NSA have to do with this? n/t
Response to PavePusher (Reply #154)
Fearless This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to PavePusher (Reply #154)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:53 PM
Fearless (9,241 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
159. I meant Secret Service.
Response to Fearless (Reply #159)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 08:13 PM
PavePusher (11,496 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
160. Ah. I thought my alphabet soup had run away with itself for a minute. n/t
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 02:49 PM
BiggJawn (22,636 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
155. Wsn't there someone back in the Shrub Era...
|
Who created a work that was an image of Little Boots against a background of nooses? It was supposed to an allegorical commentary on the number of death warrants Shrubbie signed during his tenure as Governor of Texas.
I recall the FBI and SS were VERY interested in it. |
Response to alp227 (Original post)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 09:10 PM
New7up (19 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

